Effect of Routine Sterile Gloving on Contamination Rates in Blood Culture
Blood culture is a simple and basic diagnostic procedure routinely used in clinical practice that yields essential information for the evaluation of various infectious diseases. A positive blood culture can demonstrate not only an infectious cause of disease but also a microbiological response to antibiotic therapy. However, studies have reported that 35% to 50% of positive blood cultures are falsely positive owing to contamination. False-positive cultures often cause serious interpretation problems, leading to the use of inappropriate or unnecessary antibiotics, additional testing and consultation, and increased length of stay, all of which increase health care costs. In a closed culture system in which blood is drawn directly into vacuum culture bottles, blood culture contamination occurs mainly during specimen collection. Various methods have been widely studied to reduce contamination rates, including skin disinfectants, source of culture, specialized phlebotomists, and changing of needles before inoculating culture bottles. To our knowledge, no data are available on the influence of sterile gloving on blood culture contamination rates. Consequently, some controversy exists about whether sterile gloving should be routinely used during collection of blood for culture. The current guidelines do not recommend the routine use of sterile gloving, whereas some experts prefer sterile gloving for collection of blood for culture. We sought to evaluate whether the routine use of sterile gloving before venipuncture reduces blood culture contamination rates compared with the optional use of sterile gloving in actual clinical practice.
Study Design
We conducted a prospective, cluster randomized, assessor-blinded, crossover, controlled trial. Our study was conducted for 6 months in 2009 in 17 medical wards, including 14 general wards, 2 hematology wards, and 1 intensive care unit at Seoul National University Hospital, a 1600-bed, university-affiliated tertiary-care teaching hospital in Seoul, Republic of Korea. At this hospital, medical interns rather than dedicated phlebotomists are in charge of drawing blood for cultures. We did not include the emergency department because the emergency medical technicians, as well as interns, draw blood for culture in the emergency department. The interns in the hospital were rotated from one department to another each month. The interns in the medical wards consented to participate in the study and took part in the study for 1 month. In each month, 6 to 7 interns were in charge of the 14 general wards, 2 interns in the 2 hematology wards and 2 interns in the intensive care unit. We included all cultures using blood drawn from a peripheral vein in adult patients who needed 2 or more sets of blood cultures, and we excluded blood cultures from intravenous lines and similar access devices. Consent was obtained from all participating interns.